[Dlight] Fix general reduction rule to support non-last reduction axis#17754
Merged
jinhongyii merged 1 commit intoMar 17, 2025
Merged
Conversation
This PR fixes a bug in the general reduction dlight rule, which happens when there is a trailing spatial block, and for the previous reduction blocks, the reduction axes are not on the back. In the case above, the loop orders of the reduction blocks and the trailing spatial block are inconsistent, while the dlight rule before this fix always treat the loop orders as consistent. As a result, though the function after applying the rule is numerically correct, it may require much extra shared memory use (in proportion to the size of spatial loops). And when the spatial dimensions are large, the required share memory size may exceed the device limit. This PR fixes this bug and adds a unit test.
MasterJH5574
force-pushed
the
tvm-dev/2025-03-16-dlight-sfm
branch
from
2c257a6 to
64b7520
Compare
jinhongyii
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2025
ShiboXing
pushed a commit
to ShiboXing/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2025
apache#17754) This PR fixes a bug in the general reduction dlight rule, which happens when there is a trailing spatial block, and for the previous reduction blocks, the reduction axes are not on the back. In the case above, the loop orders of the reduction blocks and the trailing spatial block are inconsistent, while the dlight rule before this fix always treat the loop orders as consistent. As a result, though the function after applying the rule is numerically correct, it may require much extra shared memory use (in proportion to the size of spatial loops). And when the spatial dimensions are large, the required share memory size may exceed the device limit. This PR fixes this bug and adds a unit test.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a bug in the general reduction dlight rule, which happens when there is a trailing spatial block, and for the previous reduction blocks, the reduction axes are not on the back.
In the case above, the loop orders of the reduction blocks and the trailing spatial block are inconsistent, while the dlight rule before this fix always treat the loop orders as consistent.
As a result, though the function after applying the rule is numerically correct, it may require much extra shared memory use (in proportion to the size of spatial loops). And when the spatial dimensions are large, the required share memory size may exceed the device limit.
This PR fixes this bug and adds a unit test.